Sample New Historicism Essays

Table of Content

1. Introduction

2. New Historicism as Literary Theorie
2.1. The Origin of New Historicism
2.2 Influential People in New Historicism
2.3. How New Historicism is applied

3. Summary of William Shakespeare`s “The Tempest”

4. New Historicism applied on „The Tempest”
4.1. Shakespeare`s Time of Textual Production
4.2. “The Tempest” and the Influence on its Time
4.3. Power Struggles in “The Tempest”

5. Conclusion

6. References

1. Introduction

The power that makes us handle ourselves and others around us is something we do not even notice, but that is central to all our lives. While actual physical violence is far away for many of us, nobody can deny how society has a certain rule over each of us. We have expectations towards others and ourselves that are central for the way we think and behave. Cultural values do not only shape our daily lives but also every text that is written. These texts on the other hand have the power to influence our values and believe on what is wrong and right.

Because I am very interested in this topic and also how texts form our picture of the world I chose to write about New Historicism.

New Historicism is a literary theory that, in my opinion, everybody can understand and relate to.

A central idea is how every text shows signs of the time and the society it is produced in. A logical consequence, since the author is never free of perceptions of his time and never subjective. On the other hand a text, read by many people, can easily influence their opinions and believes. For example the texts written about Queen Elisabeth contributed to her image of the Virgin Queen. These ideas, bought up as literary theory in New Historicism, are important until today. While books and theater plays might not be as important for many of us we are influenced, not only by television, but also by newspapers and articles we read. Our “self” is still created through the society we live in.

I chose “The Tempest” by Shakespeare to apply New Historicism on, because thinking about the main ideas of the theory I immediately found several aspects that fitted with the play.

Shakespeare wrote “The Tempest” in 1611. England was at this point the most powerful empire on the planet and also the biggest one that ever existed until today. Founded on worldwide trade and an enormous armada the empire reached from North America to Australia and included nearly five million people. Several aspects and themes important at this time can be found in the play. In addition the development of the Empire helped Shakespeare become such an influential writer, as I will explain later on.

Another important point why I chose “The Tempest” is the fact that New Historicism deals with power struggles within a social system, how it affects people and also how they rebel against it. “The Tempest” is a play full of such struggles, for example between Caliban and Prospero.

This paper contains of my introduction which you have just read, followed by a section about New Historicism in which I want to try to explain the theory and how it is applied. Within this part I will first try to make clear where the theory originated and who was important for its development. Then I will go on with how it is used. In the next part I will give a short summary of “the Tempest” to then apply New Historicism on the text with specific examples. In the end I want to show in my conclusion why it was a good choice to pick this theory and this text.

“The souls most fed with Shakespeare’s flame, still sat unconquered in a ring, remembering him like anything”, said G.K. Chesteron (1874-1936) in “The Shakespeare Memorial”. This quote and many others show how Shakespeare’s texts have the power to influence people now as well as 500 years ago. This idea is not only central to New Historicism but also what this term paper is about.

2. New Historicism as Literary Theorie

2.1. The Origin of New Historicism

New Historicism is a literary theory that, in my opinion, everybody can understand and relate to.

To do so, we first have to look at the definition of culture itself though. Culture is central in New Historicism because it defines and is defined by society, and society’s structure is important for a new historical approach. The meaning of the word “culture” has largely expanded other the last century. While once the term was “reserved for what most literary academics would now consider to be a rather narrowly defined “high” culture” (Bertens, 2008, p.135), today culture is seen as everything made by humans. Both Richard Hoggarts, an English literary critic, and Raymond Williams work contributed to this change.

“Both emphasized the valuable and life-enhancing qualities of culture, in particular working class culture that from the perspective of high culture had generally been condemned and ignored” (Bertens, 2008, p.136).

With this step a whole new field of texts and contexts opened up to cultural studies and also to literary critics. The new view of culture became central for two major literary theories: New Historicism and Cultural Materialism.

To now understand New Historicism it is of importance to also understand where it came from. New Historicism is of American origin “and has remained largely American” (Bertens, 2008, p.139). The term “New Historicism” came up when “in 1982 […] Stephen Greenblatt used it to describe recent work of himself and others on the Renaissance period” (Bertens, 2008, p.141). New Historicism developed parallel to Cultural Materialism in Britain and shows several similarities. Central Question asked in these theories are, how literary texts relate to their historical background. Both Theories are often focused on studying traditional texts such as Shakespeare, which I will also do, but since the 1980s have “spread to the study of other periods” (Bertens, 2008, p.146). Central themes are “notion of the self, of discourse, and of power” (Bertens, 2008, p.140). This means that both theories deal with how we perceive ourselves, how we interact with those around us and how we use power or are an object to power. Another central aspect of both theories is that they claim a text can never be understood out of his historical context. This also automatically makes the author a subject to his context and therefore to his historical background, living circumstances, class, family and world view.

It is important to in addition realize, that texts do not only reflect history but also “actively make history” (Bertens, 2008, p.140). A text always is a “vehicle for power” (Bertens, 2008, p.140) because it influences the people who read it. Finally both New Historicism and Cultutral Materialism do not believe that there is a difference between literary texts and other texts.

After these parallels what in the end makes New Historicism different from Cultural Materialism?

Bertens says in his book Cultural Materialism focuses more on ideology and therefore leans towards Marxism while New Historicism focuses on power and therefore leans towards Poststructuralism.

New Historicism centralizes around

“how the self is subject to power relations and how it always functions within larger structures that may even completely control whatever self-fashioning seemed initially possible. […] self is always a construction, (that) our identity is never given, but always the product of an interaction between the way we want to represent our selves […] and the power relations we are part of.” (Bertens, 2008, p.142).

This focus on power relations and on how the “self” is created through society distinguishes New Historicism from Cultural Materialism and also is what made it into one of the central theories used from the 1980´s until today.

2.2 Influential People in New Historicism

New Historicism, not only being used widely in the 20th century but still being used today, was influenced by many important Socialists and Theorists.

While Stephen Greenblatt was the first to use the term “New Historicism”, Michel Foucault and Jonathan Dollimore where two theorists, who contributed to the definition of the term.

As you can read in the book `Literary Theory` by Ingo Berenymeyer Michel Foucault was teaching “at the University of California, Berkeley, in the 1970s” (Berensmeyer, 2014, p.104) and while he was also involved in the development of other literary theories such as Structuralism he encouraged his students to find a connection between texts and their historical background. Because of this Berkely became the center of the development of New Historicism in America. Students, often specialized in Renaissance literature, “rose to the challenge of developing a new approach to the interplay between literary texts and their historical contexts” (Berensmeyer, 2014, p.104). Stephen Greenblatt was one of them.

Jonathan Dollimore on the other hand was a social theorist and studied at the University of London. In 1984 he wrote his first edition of “Radical Tragedy”, a second edition in 1989 and a third in 2004 followed. In the first edition Dollimore “argues that dominant ideologies of the time, such as the religious idea of providentialism, ‘constituted an ideological underpinning for ideas of absolute monarchy and divine right’ and were thus used by the state to support its centers of power.” (UK Essays, 2014). While he is often said to have been a Cultural Materialist this clearly also is an important point in New Historicism. In his second edition Dollimore argues that “the theater played a crucial role in contributing to the eventual collapse of the institutions of the Church and State” (UK Essay, 2014). This takes the idea of New Historicism further because now we don not only look at how Shakespeare was influenced by his time but also how his texts influenced the time. Both ideas though have become central to New Historicism.

Although there are many other important theorists such as Louis Montrose, in my opinion Foucault and Dollimore where two that influenced the development (in America) very much and their opinions had an effect on how we use New Historicism today.

[...]

New Historicism Essay

The interpretation of language in the form of speech or written texts is a particular case of interpretation of world and life in general. Once a written text is available, it can be considered apart of the circumstances and actual situation at the time of writing; as a result many critics start to establish a relationship between literature and history which goes along with their believe of the importance of material heritage to the study of history and culture.


New historicism is anew theory that began at the beginning of the 1980,it can be defined as the conjunction of a number of prior discourses, or ways of speaking, about literature and language, and not by inspiration of any single individual .The name most often associated with New Historicism is Stephen Greenblatt, a critic of Renaissance literature, he is an English professor and the progenitor of "the new historicism" theory. Greenblatt published his selection of Renaissance essays which constituted 'anew historicism' it was the first period to generate lots of New Historicist criticism. It has since become important in criticism of Medieval, and nineteenth century British and American literature, and is working its way through

criticism of modernist literature and eighteenth century literature. He aims to make connections between Shakespeare's plays and the political atmosphere in Elizabethan England, for example, or between his own theory and the intellectual atmosphere during the 1970s and 1980s; He studied the historical background for any works of literature to deepen his understandings of these works and help guard against misunderstandings of the intentions of their authors.


"The circumstances which have most influence on the happiness of mankind, the changes of manners and morals, the transition of communities from poverty to wealth, from knowledge to ignorance, from ferocity to humanity - these are, for the most part, noiseless revolutions. Their progress is rarely indicated by what historians are pleased to call important events. They are not achieved by armies, or enacted by senates. They are sanctioned by no treaties, and recorded in no archives. They are carried on in every school, in every church, behind ten thousand counters, at ten thousand firesides." (Maculay, "The Task of the Modern Historian.")


In this dense passage, Thomas Babington Macaulay is trying to show the importance of history and what it carries with it; in addition he conveys his idea of how the historian job should be done. he also added on this field that "He alone reads history aright, who, observing how powerfully circumstances influence the feelings and opinions of men, how often vices

pass into virtues, and paradoxes into axioms, learns to distinguish what is accidental and transitory in human nature, from what is essential and

immutable." (Macaulay, "Machiavelli.") Here Macaulay is articulating his point of view with Greenblatt notion of having...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Lesson From History: Schindler's List Essay

731 words - 3 pages Steven Spielberg’s movie Schindler’s List applies to the literary criticism, New Historicism. In many instances, this film portrays historical accuracies. The film compares to World War II history. Adolf Hitler’s extraordinary political power shows in this film. His corrupt and evil leadership and his actions and decisions cannot be rationalized or justified under any political power. Schindler’s List recovers history of a specific World War...

A Clean Well-Lighted Place Essay

1677 words - 7 pages A Clean Well-Lighted Place A Clean, Well-Lighted Place by Ernest Hemingway looks at age from the viewpoint of an inexperienced and experienced individual, with the aid of an old man to emphasize the difference between the two. This story takes place late one night in a caf. The caf is clean, pleasant, and well lighted, which brings some kind of comfort to the atmosphere. Here in the caf sits a deaf, lonely, older man, who although is deaf...

Stories of the Vietnam War Illustrated in O’Brien’s The Things They Carried

802 words - 3 pages Tim O’Brien’s book, The Things They Carried, portrays stories of the Vietnam War. Though not one hundred percent accurate, the stories portray important historical events. The Things They Carried recovers Vietnam War history and portrays situations the American soldiers faced. The United States government represents a political power effect during the Vietnam War. The U. S. enters the war to prevent a communist takeover of South Vietnam. The...

Christianity, Reform and Freedom in Method

2447 words - 10 pages I feel like I need to begin my methodological introduction with graffiti. Graffiti that says: "Bercovitch Bites," or "Foster Rules," or even "Stop Elitist Historicists." Nothing particularly original -- just a few key phrases that capture the frustration I have felt while researching New Historicism and more particularly, its application to texts. Somehow, graffiti -- the unscholarly domain of angry teenagers armed with cans of spray paint --...

Philosophy in the Enlightenment Era: The Age of Reason

1288 words - 5 pages During the 17th and 18th century, there was a movement that begun to put an emphasis on individuality, more specifically, the use of reason. The era of enlightenment saw the replacement of historical traditions, in favor of using reasoning to achieve freedom. Man by nature, desire to know what occurred in the past. History is concerned with narrating concepts and actions. Historicism is a theory that social and cultural occurrences are...

The Internal State of the Character Hamlet

1899 words - 8 pages The Internal State of Hamlet    Abstract: This essay uses psychoanalytic, new historicism, and deconstructive methods of criticism to expore the scene in which Hamlet stands before Claudius and Gertrude after he has killed Polonius. The oblective is to provide a better understanding of how Shakespeare uses the events in the play as a means of shaping or changing Hamlet's actions or emotions Hamlet is a character with emotions that are...

Historicism with Jean Genet's Querelle

2458 words - 10 pages "I recognize in thieves, traitors and murderers, in the ruthless and the cunning, a deep beauty-a sunken beauty." (Jean Genet) "I'm homosexual... How and why are idle questions. It's a little like wanting to know why my eyes are green." (Jean Genet) A nod of acknowledgement and understanding should descend upon every head that has read Querelle and is aware that Jean Genet is the author after looking at the above two quotes. Genet’s fiction...

Symbolism in Yeat's 'The Wild Swan at Coole’ and ‘Easter 1916'

598 words - 2 pages Writers are judged if they’re deemed to be worthy enough in become part of the canon, in the early 20th century, William Butler Yeats, an Irish poet, was deemed worthy enough as he speaks to us across time, culture and political beliefs through his poem which contains timeless truths which are valued by human beings Two of Yeats’s poem ‘The Wild Swan at Coole’ and ‘Easter 1916’ which I’m going to refer as ‘Wild Swan’ and ‘Easter’ both poem...

Historical Re-Interpretations: Writing/Re-Writing of Ethnography and Historiography

2956 words - 12 pages “Those who tell the stories also hold the power”-Plato French social theorist Michel Foucault developed a notion of discourse in “The Archaeology of Knowledge” and defined it as “systems of thoughts composed of ideas, attitudes, courses of action, beliefs and practices that systematically constructs the subjects and the worlds of which they speak”. Foucault traces the role of discourse in wider social processes of legitimating and power,...

Feminine Representation in Shakespeare's Hamlet

2671 words - 11 pages Feminine Representation in Shakespeare's Hamlet        Abstract: This essay employs Feminist Criticism, New Historicism, and Marxist Criticism, to analyze the portrayal of Queen Gertrude and Ophelia.   Because Shakespeare's Hamlet centers on the internal struggle of the Prince of Denmark, the reader focuses primarily on his words and actions.  An often overlooked or under appreciated aspect of the play is the portrayal of the female...

Understanding Wolff’s Analysis of Chopin’s The Awakening

867 words - 3 pages Understanding Wolff’s Analysis of Chopin’s The Awakening “Un-Utterable Longing” analyzes The Awakening from the diverse, yet overlapping perspectives of deconstruction, feminist/gender theory, new historicism, and psychoanalytic criticism. Much like Yaeger and Treichler, Wolff attributes Edna’s struggle and eventual demise to her failed search for a language that voices her (un)womanly desires. Wolff first adopts the new historicist viewpoint...

0 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *